You Don't Know Your Function as a Member of the Military

The basic difference between the military and law enforcement is quite simple.  The military protects the country from outsiders and law enforcement protects the people inside the country.  But that is not always the case as we have seen many times in dictatorial countries where the military is used to suppress their own citizens.  As obvious as it is, most military as well as law enforcement personnel don't realize that they are citizens of their country too.  So when the military acquiesces to suppress the citizens, they, in fact, suppress themselves.  Military loyalty belongs to the people only; never to the government.  If your oath is to the head of state then your life is in the hands of only one man.  Hitler purged many in his military even after they swore an oath to him.  Stalin purged nearly all of his first line commanders out of sheer paranoia.  Obama is purging many of the US military top brass, not by killing them like Hitler and Stalin, but by cashiering them out of the service; those who he feels don't or will not go along with his Progressive plans for the future.  Whatever that is.
One must never forget that the only allegiance that protects a military person is his allegiance to his country, not an individual.  For once that individual loses favor, whether killed or deposed, then you lose favor in the eye of the new ruler.  How can the new power trust you if your allegiance was to the one he killed or overthrew?  My basic premise is that if anyone asks you to pledge allegiance to himself, kill him immediately; as sooner or later he will kill you, have you killed or directly cause your death.  Usually death by torture.
(U.S. Navy '51-'55.  Korea & China Service Medals.)

You Don't Have A "Look Here First" Bin.

Several years ago I bought a medium size plastic bin and put a label on it which says:  "Look Here First."  I can't remember whether I picked a purple one to distinguish it from all the other bins but now I think it's a good idea.  Anything that I find that I can't readily identify or not sure what it's for, I just throw it into the bin.  Of course there are many things that I know their use but have no special place where I'll be able to find it at a much later date.  These items go into the bin.  "When will I use those shower curtain hooks again?"  "Where did I put that bulb for the flashlight."  How many times have I asked myself where the batteries are?  All similar items go into the bin.  Small items are bagged in see-through plastic bags and marked.  Unless, merely looking at them is obvious what they are and their use.  As I've moved several times there are many small items such as nuts & bolts and curtain hooks.  What about that special tool that can only be used to take the patio set apart?  I can't tell you how many times arriving at the new destination I found just the item I needed to complete a project.  That purple bin with the "Look Here First" sign on it has also saved me many hours throughout the years.  Every six months or so I take the bin out of the closet and review its contents.  Sometimes I'm then able to identify an item and able to attach it to or fix an item.  This purple bin has saved me a lot of frustration.

You Break My Heart

My?  Whomever the heart belongs to.  Adults can have their hearts broken but I speak mostly of the hearts that belong to children.  Every child has a special love of something in his heart.  If that something is taken away then that child's heart will be broken.  Adults, whether parents, grandparent or teachers, are usually the ones who break a child's heart.  Usually the adult will take away "that thing" to punish the child for a misdeed, but that is never the proper thing to do.  There are many other punishments that may be meted out that will get the point across and help to make the child behave.  But if you take away that "one thing" the child may never reach his full potential or be as happy as he would have been.
One man I personally knew always wanted to play football.  Although he became famous in his state as a basketball player his true passion was football.  As his mother thought that the sport was too dangerous she never let him play football.  He eventually became an alcoholic, was arrested for DUI many times, besides other problems in his marriage.  Can playing football be dangerous?  Of course, but would it have been more dangerous than ruining his life?
It's not only an activity or an inanimate object but also inattention, isolation or ridicule can break a child's heart.  Special needs children are more prone to have their hearts broken as they don't understand all that is happening to them.  The more vulnerable the easier their hearts are broken.  Supervisory adults should be extra sensitive in this area so not to totally destroy their wards.  We adults will eventually die but what kind of child do you want to be left behind?  One that was well nurtured or one whose heart you broke?

You Don't Use Your Emergency Flashing Lights To Warn A Tailgater.

The other day I saw a driver put on his emergency lights to advise the driver behind him that he was following too closely.  Tailgating.
It seems that this procedure was taught in the United States by driving instructors back in the 60's.  Why has this technique been dropped?
Isn't it an emergency when one tailgates you and therefore puts you in danger of being involved in an accident?  We use our emergency flashers for many situations, such as when you see an obstruction ahead and will make an emergency stop.  When you merely use your brake lights, usually the driver in back of you feels that you're merely slowing down and will then resume your speed.  But if you use your emergency flashers the driver tailgating will know that there's an emergency ahead and will slow down and back off.  (He doesn't know that he's the emergency but you know you're in danger).  Once he realizes that you didn't slow down he may catch up and start tailgating again.  If you repeat the procedure he should eventually get the message that you think he's tailgating and putting you in danger.
This should become a universal signal to tell the driver in back that he's tailgating -- among other reasons. If you can't see all of the front tires of the car in back of you -- then he's tailgating.

You Don't Know What Flashing Headlights Mean

Every driver seems to know that when an approaching car's driver flashes his high beams it means cop ahead.  That is true in many situations but certainly not the only reason the other drivers do it.  I live on a high mesa where there are a lot of animals, mainly deer and turkeys.  When I encounter animals in or near the roadway I flash the oncoming drivers of the danger, not only for the safety of the animals but also their safety.  Hitting a large animal at an advanced speed will certainly cause (heavy) damage to the car but also many times causes serious injury to the occupants of the car.  These are not the only reasons why drivers flash their high beams.  What about construction ahead; an accident blocking the roadway; an emergency vehicle partially in the roadway, such as a police vehicle that stopped to assist a motorist or give the driver a citation for a violation; rocks in the roadway in their lane in avalanche prone areas, or any number of other hazardous obstacles.  No need to slam on your brakes sending your passengers through the windshield.  But certainly let up on the accelerator (gas pedal) allowing the vehicle to slow down a bit and be ready to slow down further or stop if necessary.  If you're speeding then, of course, hit the brakes and get back to the speed limit before you get to the spot where the cop is hiding behind the billboard.  Of course as a LEO (retired) I never hid behind a billboard, but around a curve.

You Don't Know What You Are as a Law Enforcement Officer

When a law enforcement officer breaches his oath he is no longer an officer. But what about the oath?  It must be to protect the Constitution if his country has one, the laws of his country if they are moral and to protect the people of his city, state or country.  An oath is illegal and never binding if its intent is to protect the government or sworn to a specific person.  No man or government is above the moral laws of humanity.  Any supposed law enforcement officer who swears allegiance to an individual is a thug, criminal or insane.  Some officers may believe that because they are being paid by the government he must obey the orders of said government.  That belief is a total falsehood as no government has ever paid their employees.  In fact, no government has ever had any money to pay anyone.  All government employees are paid by the citizens of their country whether through the taxes that they pay or that the government obtains other capital by confiscating (stealing) the natural resources or the resources of its citizens.  "I was only following orders," uttered many officers as they were marched to the gallows or prison.  The Nuremberg Trials after WWII has clearly defined this concept.  If an officer follows an unlawful order (an order against humanity) he and only he is responsible for the action that he takes.  You can't blame it on any one else.  I would venture to say that nearly half of the alleged police officers in the world are merely goons of one other man.  When that man falls then all your (unlawful) powers disappear overnight.  Then what will you do?  The next tyrannical leader must kill you as your pledge was to support another, not him.  But if your oath is to your country then you can serve under any change in government.  To the good moral officers I wish you a safe journey through your profession.  To all the others, how does it feel knowing that you're merely a stooge?
(I'm a retired Law Enforcement Officer.)

You Have No Means For Self-Defense

The most efficient tool for personal self defense is a weapon.  The most efficient weapon is the gun.  Every able-bodied person, of sound mind, in the world should own one.  It doesn't matter whether your government says or has laws against you owning one.  Most people in the world are slaves as they have no way to defend themselves and must obey their master/government.  Governments disarm their citizens because they are afraid of them as they (and they know) are lousy, greedy, power hungry, elitist, psychotic leaders.  These leaders believe that they have the right to do what they want to their subjects.  I call you subjects because only in a free country are there citizens.
Are you afraid of your government?  You should be, as in the last century, governments, after disarming their citizens, murdered 170,000,000 of you.  More of you are killed by your government than all the enemies in all the wars.  If most of the criminals in your countries can obtain guns, despite all the laws, why can't you?  Criminals are smarter than most as they don't tell the government that they have guns.  Why would you?   The irony is that the educated people should know better but they either do nothing or feel secure, but they are the ones in the most danger.  "It can't happen to me.  I'm educated."  Cambodia, 1975-1979.  "During that time, about 1.5 million Cambodians out of a total population of 7 to 8 million died of starvation, execution, disease or overwork. ... The Khmer Rouge, in their attempt to socially engineer a classless peasant society, took particular aim at intellectuals, city residents, ethnic Vietnamese, civil servants and religious leaders."  (Source:  Isn't that what the American and most European governments are trying to do today?  Attempting to socially engineer a new society?   Muslim jihadists are trying to send you back to the 7th century.  Should be "fun" times.

Sometimes I Am.

Why do I say that sometimes I am?  With followers from 58 foreign countries I think it's time that I pay more attention to ideas that will enhance freedom and safety not only for my countrymen but also yours.  I would appreciate your ideas, comments and suggestions whether focusing on yourself, your specific country or in general for all of us.  Pejorative remarks or statements, of course, will be deleted.  Again my apology for my past transgression and pray that we can help each other towards a more free and safe world.  Thank You.

You Don't Know What Stealing Is.

Pennsylvania Law:  "theft of lost property."  (where the defendant fails to try to return the lost property to its rightful owner).  Most states have the same or similar laws.
A few months back my son lost his cell phone.  He was able to trace it to an affluent street in Philadelphia but could not pin-point the exact house as then the phone was probably turned off.  As a college student it was a major loss as he had to replace it with another at a cost of $400.00.
The finder probably using the excuse that "finders keepers, losers weepers" knows or is ignorant of the fact that that old saying is not true.
The finder could have easily found the owner merely by calling any of the phone numbers listed on said phone.  Obviously anyone owning these numbers knows my son or he wouldn't have their number listed as contacts.
Or just as easily turn the phone into the nearest police station where an officer would have called any of the numbers listed on the phone to easily trace the owner.
The finder, who lives on an affluent street, most likely has a lot more money than a struggling college student and through his arrogance and lack of empathy feels that he had a windfall and bragged to his family and friends of his good luck.  Obviously his family and friends are just as ignorant as he and/or were afraid to tell him that he was now a criminal.  Being of the same mindset, i.e., ignorant, stupid and cowards.

  • theft of services;
  • theft of lost property (where the defendant fails to try to return the lost property to its rightful owner)
  • - See more at:

  • theft of services;
  • theft of lost property (where the defendant fails to try to return the lost property to its rightful owner)
  • - See more at:
    theft of lost property (where the defendant fails to try to return the lost property to its rightful owner) - See more at:
    theft of lost property (where the defendant fails to try to return the lost property to its rightful owner) - See more at: