You Think America and Canada Is Not At Risk

Sent to me via email by an American Patriot.

So England doesn't like the US recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.  Imagine that! 

I thought this might give you a better
understanding of the insidiousness of Hijrah, that's the takeover of a nation without going to war. 

Don't think for a moment that America is not a target or that there are no American cities where Islamic and Sharia victories and takeovers have already occurred.  It's time for border control, or start planning for a very big goodbye to the American way of life…  Here's what has already happened to England   within a few years of opening their borders without any entry control:

How the British have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:
 Mayor of London … MUSLIM,
Mayor of Birmingham … MUSLIM,
Mayor of Leeds … MUSLIM,
Mayor of Blackburn … MUSLIM,
Mayor of Sheffield … MUSLIM,
Mayor of Oxford … MUSLIM,
Mayor of Luton … MUSLIM,
Mayor of Oldham … MUSLIM,
Mayor of Rochdale … MUSLIM.

All the following achieved by just four million Muslims out of the 66 million population:
Over 3,000 Muslim Mosques,
Over 130 Muslim Sharia Courts,
Over 50 Muslim Sharia Councils,
Muslims Only No-Go Areas across the U K,

Muslim Women … 78% don't work and are on FREE benefits / housing,
Muslim Men … 63% don't work and are on FREE benefits / housing,
Muslim Families … six to eight children planning to go on FREE benefits / housing and now all UK schools are ONLY serving HALAL MEAT.

… and we (the U S A) and (CANADA) can't decide on an immigration policy… ?

One of the ways to combat this is to keep circulating information such as this e-mail around our United States and Canada to inform the uninformed who mainly only listen and read the left leaning U S and Canadian radio / TV and newspapers.  I have not seen this in the U S
or Canadian media…

You Can't Maintain a Safe Distance

Going to the store and back, I traveled on the same winding, mountain road. Absolutely no cars within two to three miles in either direction; except for stupid.

Going, a truck started tailgating me, so I slowed down to give him the message. He eventually did, but the rest of the way he got close and then backed off, close, then backed off, nearly a dozen times. The road is two lanes with no passing-zones, so he couldn't go anyplace or any faster than I was going.

On my way back there was an SUV behind me that kept a safe, constant distance all the way. Here is one idiot that speeds up, then brakes, speeds up, then brakes. How uncomfortable is that kind of driving? The other driver just fell comfortably behind me and we did the eight miles in about 10 minutes. In other words, I don't impede traffic.

It's far more comfortable following someone than to lead, as the one following can observe the front car, and therefore, is helped in his driving. Years ago while traveling on a fog covered, slippery road at night for about a 100 miles, I tagged up with another car. We both knew that leading in that kind of condition is very tiring, so we leapfrogged each other every 15-20 minutes to help each other out. If you're a good driver you can easily spot another one, and without communicating, both just know what to do.